Reflection and revision are ongoing processes that happen before, during and after a unit is rolled out to students. In past classroom experiences, my students’ input is always a part of the process. Seeing how they interpret, manage and learn provides me with information I cannot anticipate on my own. It will be like that with this PBL too, especially since my “students” are professional educators. I value their input. I am particularly interested in the content value versus time invested balance.
Because this is a job-embedded model of professional development, I see informal check-ins with teachers as an ongoing process. I’m sure there will be teachers willing to “reflect” at me regularly. I will also likely use a survey (Google Forms) a couple times throughout the unit to formally check in and request feedback. When I see that something is not working as planned, I’ll make a note of it or change it immediately if possible.
My administration will also play a role in the post-reflection process. I know I will be constantly checking in with my manager on our progress, and his input will definitely be considered. As school goals and needs change, topics included in my PBL may need to reflect that change. Because this model of tech integration is a new process for the school, revisions may have to take place as hiccups come along. Flexibility is key.
No comments:
Post a Comment